Not on any Eastbourne Borough Council or East Sussex County Council or most estate agents or chartered surveyors websites is it revealed that 3,119 residential freeholders and leaseholders of Sovereign Harbour property must pay a unique Annual Estate Rentcharge of £263.55 per residential unit for 2020 in addition to council taxes, property insurance, management fees and ground rents. Nor is it stated that in no other flood area or harbour or marina area or private estate anywhere else in Britain, the UK, Europe or the world is this Annual Estate Tax similarly payable. Part of it is for Environment Agency-provided flood defence. A much wider flood zone area than just Sovereign Harbour is involved, affecting more than 15,500 homes from Eastbourne to Bexhill on Sea, 8 miles east. But the Sovereign Harbour Trust and Premier Marinas, both owned by The Wellcome Trust, make only landowning or leasing Sovereign Harbour residents and their successors pay it, not neighboring communities equally affected, or businesses including managing agents and property developers. This makes Sovereign Harbour the only place in the UK, Britain and the world with both such a unique and unfair combined resident-subsidized harbour charge and Environment Agency-levied surcharge. A second unique covenant requires owners/leaseholders of 369 South Harbour properties in the water feature precinct to pay a further annual charge of of more than £328. It is the only such water feature in the world that applies such a charge to properties adjacent to or overlooking it. Notice about this second covenant is also withheld by most estate agents from prospective buyers of relevant Sovereign Harbour South properties.
|Sovereign Harbour||Estate Rentcharge||Council Tax Wrongs||Disability Association||EBC Councillors||E-mails|
|Forbes Clan||General John Forbes||Pensioners Concerns||Property Guidelines||Two Eastbourne's||July 4 music|
Written by Keith A. Forbes, a member of the UK's The Society of Authors and an activist for the elderly and disabled. He and his wife live in the harbour.
For details of why Sovereign Harbour is the Toxic Annual Rentcharge Capital of the World, see below under Sovereign Harbour Trust and its CIC
Eastbourne's Sovereign Harbour is situated 2.5 miles east of Eastbourne on the A259 Pevensey Bay Road going to Bexhill-On-Sea and Hastings and a part of Eastbourne Borough Council's Sovereign Ward (a bigger area than just Sovereign Harbour and the easternmost of Eastbourne's 12 electoral wards). It was developed by Carillion Construction Limited. It had a huge and complex national and international (Canada, etc) corporate portfolio until January 2018 when it was put into involuntary liquidation and publicly disgraced. It included being a major supplier to the UK government. It helped to maintain schools and hospitals and was also part of a consortium building the £56bn HS2 high-speed rail link. Carillion was finally involuntarily liquidated but there is still a Bermuda company by that name.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Photos above and below by authors Keith and Lois Forbes
Sovereign Harbour comprises an area of 330 acres developed since the 1990s to provide harbour and marina facilities for Eastbourne which previously had none. It is Northern Europe's largest composite marina complex. It is both a marina (divided into four parts) and a seafront harbour, with the harbour opening out into separate parts. The four marinas border the separate harbours. The Outer Harbour is tidal, whilst the Inner, South, North and West Harbours are entered through two high capacity locks, both manned 24 hours, 365 days a year, providing access to the sea irrespective of the state of the tide. Opened in 1993 by the late Princess Diana, it has 800 permanent berths, with some 3,000 yachts visiting each year. The Outer Harbour is tidal, whilst the Inner, South, North and West Harbours are entered through two high capacity locks, both manned 24 hours, 365 days a year, providing access to the sea irrespective of the state of the tide. All the many streets in the four residential areas have overseas names from exotic places (for example, Bermuda) around the world. Premier Marina is no longer the independently separate company it once was. In recent years it was sold to the Blackrock UK Property Fund and became a wholly owned subsidiary, still trading (as it does today) as Premier Marinas. Later, it was sold to The Wellcome Trust and is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the latter. The Wellcome Trust - a charitable foundation (except to the residents of its Sovereign Harbour to whom it charges £263.55 Annual Estate Rentcharge per house or flat as mentioned earlier), was created in 1936 by the will of Sir Henry Wellcome and its sole trustee is The Wellcome Trust Limited, a private company limited by guarantee. Premier Marinas Holdings Limited is a private company limited by shares.
In addition to its multi-harbour marinas it has the Sovereign Harbour Village Waterfront harbour-front area with its restaurants, bars and other business services, either owned or leased to other undertakings by The Wellcome Trust/Premier Marinas conglomerate. Also included geographically in the Sovereign Harbour area but not owned by The Wellcome Trust/Premier Marinas Holdings Limited but by M&G is the adjacent Crumbles - also styled Sovereign Harbour Village - retail park shopping centre. Some of the latter's stores (for example, the supermarket ASDA) and restaurants are frequented by residents of other parts of Eastbourne and nearby including Pevensey and Pevensey Bay, and Polegate, as far east as Bexhill-on-Sea. The regional ASDA superstore has almost 100,000 square feet. There are also branches of Boots, Frankie & Benny's restaurant, a gym, Matalan, Next, Sports Direct, T K. Maxx, Wilko and a disability-friendly sports outfit. Until mid- 2019 there was a good multi-screen Cineworld cinema much appreciated by Sovereign Harbour residents complete with plenty of free parking in the retail park but to the chagrin of all Sovereign Harbour residents it was lured away by Bermuda-incorporated Legal & General's Beacon Shopping Centre.
Also in Sovereign Harbour are the Harbour Medical Practice for NHS patients, with its GPs, nurses and support staff, built in 2014 with about 6,300 patients and, from May 2018, at long last, a publicly-provided-and-paid-for by Eastbourne Borough Council and East Sussex County Council the Sovereign Harbour Community Centre.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Sovereign Harbour North, part of marina. Photo cc these authors Keith and Lois Forbes
More will be following shortly. When completed, all will also show their North, South or other harbour locations
|Bermuda Place||BN23 5TE|
|Daytona Quay||BN23 5BN|
|Hamilton Quay||BN23 5PX|
|Havana Court:||BN23 5UH|
|Key West||BN23 5TD|
|Kingston Quay||BN23 5UP|
|Leeward Quay||BN23 5UD|
|Midway Quay||BN23 5DD, 5DE, 5DF, 5DG|
|The Piazza||BN23 5TG & 5TQ|
|Santos Wharf||BN23 5UR|
|Madeira Way||BN23 5UJ, 5U, 5UN|
Thousands of members of the public who are not Sovereign Harbour residents use these beaches every year, most believing, wrongly, they are publicly owned. Many who take advantage of these beaches abuse them by littering, leaving broken glass from bottles, vandalizing signs and plants or allowing their dogs to run free, fouling the beach. Far too many fail to pick up their dogs’ faeces. In the hottest months of June 2020 when 2 metre Covid 19 pandemic social distancing was in effect, this was routinely ignored, risking not only those who swam or cavorted or gathered or had picnics but residents in private properties near to or opposite them. At times in June, July, August and September, it is so bad that residents of the properties opposite the beaches, who live on properties that include the beachfront across the walkways and surely have or should have some exclusivity but do not, were unable to use areas of the beaches because they were occupied by non-resident members of the public.
Unfortunately for local residents, the public is allowed by the landlord developers of each property to use these pebble beaches. But there is an important proviso that needs to be noted. It is that as far as the developers are concerned you do so entirely at your own risk with the developers not responsible for any land or see accident, injury or death. However, a good solicitor will challenge this blanket no-fault waiver.
Who owns them? There are no signs stating this, as there should be. In the case of the beachfront areas opposite the five buildings of the Chatsworth Strand development off San Diego Way, the buildings are owned by Jones Homes Ltd and managing agents are Ross & Co.
Developers and landlords concerned are those who own the apartments and flats or other homes opposite particular sections of the beaches and across the pedestrian walkway. Their properties extend from where they are all the way to the high water mark. Although responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the beach up to the high water mark, the management companies of the developments concerned have declined to undertake any maintenance or upkeep, or enforce any requirements with regard to anti-social behavior, dog fouling and litter.
Photo right: Sovereign Harbour North Beach fishing. Photo cc Keith and Lois Forbes
Below the high water mark, the local authorities own the ground and water.
Beaches cannot be used by the resident or visiting disabled or those with balance or walking difficulties. Why? There is too much of a downward and upward slope of the pebbles for those with either mobility or walking problems or in a wheelchair.
There are no benches, bins, seats, signs, railings, toilets, no benches, railings.
In 2007 Natural England designated these beaches a Site of Nature Conservation Interest.
No cycling on beach walkways! They are walkways for pedestrians and this is clearly marked on cyclists maps and by cycling organizations. Cyclists who ignore cycling restrictions and hit and injure a pedestrian who is able or disabled will find themselves in court, prosecuted by the injured. The walkways on the beach and harbour-side are accessible to both wheelchair and mobility scooters but not cycles. When a person is injured by a cyclist on a beach walkway, liability also falls to the Eastbourne Borough Council and East Sussex County Council.
These beaches are legally, geographically and physically in the town of Eastbourne's Sovereign Ward area and residents pay their council and council-tax-related taxes to both Eastbourne Borough Council and East Sussex Borough Council. This surely should mean that the present arrangement whereby the Pevensey Bay entity that presently exclusively both controls these beaches at the behest of the Sovereign Harbour Trust and Environment Agency and gets 3,704 local residents (but no one else) to pay for the flood defences that also cover a much wider area involving more than 17,000 residents all the way to Bexhill, should be abolished, with these beaches at long last fully incorporated into Eastbourne's listing of public town beaches. While the general public continues to freely use and abuse them and this is encouraged by the beach owners they should not be considered as private beaches but should be forced by the councils authorities concerned to be re-classified as public beaches. In the meantime, Sovereign Harbour beachfront area residents are not getting value for money for the beachfront flood defence and harbour defences they alone, nowhere else in the UK or Europe or the world, are required to pay to the Environment Agency.
Beaches below the high water mark are owned by the Eastbourne Borough Council and/or East Sussex Borough Council. So why don't they pay their part of the cost of annual flood protection that would come as a possible flood from the sea at these beaches, otherwise known as the Annual Estate Rentcharge, misleadingly referred to by estate agents as the Sovereign Harbour charge, covering a much wider area than just Sovereign Harbour? Payment is made solely, massively unfairly, only by the 2,400 or residents of Sovereign Harbour beachside and nearby buildings, not by any of the 17,000 other residents of the flood protection zone stretching all the way to Cooden Beach in Bexhill. Nowhere else in the UK or Europe or the world where there are shingle or sand or both beaches and have flood areas imposes such a charge solely on local residents. Neither beach appears on any Eastbourne town beach maps (they extend only as far as groyne number 94 the Langney roundabout, not further east). See http://www.eastbourne.gov.uk/_resources/assets/inline/full/0/209207.pdf. It may be because this beach did not exist when the last Eastbourne Borough Council beach areas were last codified, generations ago. Consequently, regulations applicable to other Eastbourne beaches and relevant to control of dog-walking, dog messes and other beach activities such as barbeques, etc. that should apply here, do not. Yet the Eastbourne Borough Council has now long included the Sovereign Ward as one of its council areas for council tax, education, voting and other purposes. It needs to now amend its beaches listing to include this Sovereign North Harbour Beach (and its neighbor the Sovereign South Harbour Beach). Until it does so, the council has been unable to act in any of the numerous complaints about dog fouling and more from local beachside and other owner residents, many of whom in fact pay more in council taxes than in other parts of Eastbourne.
In Sovereign Harbour, reporting a seafront issue. Instead of dealing with it as a council issue, as it does in all other Eastbourne beaches, the Eastbourne Borough Council (EBC), see http://www.eastbourne.gov.uk/residents/leisure-and-events/eastbourne-seafront/report-a-problem/report-a-seafron Thist-issue/ - states it is unable to respond to reports about Sovereign Harbour. This makes the EBC the only local authority not only in the whole of the UK but also in the rest of the world with a beach in the local authority's jurisdiction over which it does not regulate or have oversight or receive complaints and it is not responsible.Dogs on Leashes abuses on North beach have still not addressed by the Eastbourne Borough Council. It was first mentioned in the Sovereign Harbour Residents Association's June 2007 Waterlines, see http://www.waterlines.onl/Waterlines%20Printed/waterlines025.pdf.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Sovereign Harbour Martello Tower 64 (North Beach)
North Beach. A shingle beach, located to the north east of Eastbourne, at Sovereign Harbour North, mid-way between Langney Point and Pevensey Bay. From here, walkers can walk all the way to Pevensey Bay beach. This beach is not connected to the Sovereign Harbour South Beach because the sea entrance to Sovereign Harbour lies between. Its principal features are the Martello Tower 64 (see below), the signposted SS Barnhill Wreck Site, see http://www.eastbourneherald.co.uk/news/info-board-on-wreck-unveiled-at-harbour-1-6673014, and the spit of land at the harbour mouth from which can be seen the outer harbour of the 5-harbour Sovereign Harbour complex.
South Beach. Not connected to the Sovereign Harbour North Beach because the sea entrance to Sovereign Harbour lies between. There is no longer a Martello Tower 65, it was claimed by the sea generations ago. Unique to South east coast of England, with only two of them ever built abroad (at then-British Army posts in Barbuda, Caribbean and Bermuda, North Atlantic). Martello Tower 64 and 66 (here in South Beach) are historic monuments. The first includes both a Martello tower and a World War II gun emplacement on top of it, The tower, which is Listed Grade II, lies around 1km north east of its surviving neighbor, tower no 66. Martello tower 64 retains many of its original components. It is one (like 66) of the surviving examples of a series of low-lying towers, designed to defend a specific stretch of coastline. The addition of a gun emplacement during World War II represents the continued significance of this defensive position well into the 20th century. Martello towers were gun towers constructed to defend the vulnerable south eastern coast of England against the threat of ship-borne invasion by Napoleonic forces. They were built as a systematic chain of defence in two phases, between 1805-1810 along the coasts of East Sussex and Kent, and between 1808- 1812 along the coasts of Essex and Suffolk. They are referred to as Martello Towers because their design was based on a fortified tower at Martello Point in Corsica which had put up a prolonged resistance to British forces in 1793. The towers take the form of compact, free-standing circular buildings on three levels built of rendered brick. The towers of the south coast were numbered 1-74 from east to west, while those of the east coast were identified by a system of letters (A-Z, and then AA-CC) from south to north. Although they exhibit a marked uniformity of design, minor variations are discernible between the southern and eastern groups and amongst individual towers, due mainly to the practice of entrusting their construction to local sub-contractors. Most southern towers are elliptical in plan, whilst the eastern group are oval or cam-shaped externally, with axes at the base ranging between 14.4m by 13.5m and 16.9m by 17.7m. All are circular internally, the battered (inwardly sloping) walls of varying thicknesses, but with the thickest section invariably facing the seaward side. Most stand to a height of around 10m. Many Martello towers are surrounded by dry moats originally encircled by counterscarp banks, and/or have cunettes (narrower water defences) situated at the foot of the tower wall. The ground floor was used for storage, with accommodation for the garrison provided on the first floor, and the main gun platform on the roof. The southern towers carried a single 24 pounder cannon, whilst the eastern line carried three guns (usually a 24 pounder cannon and two shorter guns or howitzers). Three large, circular ten- gun towers known as redoubts were also constructed at particularly vulnerable points, at Dymchurch, Eastbourne and Harwich. All three survive. As the expected Napoleonic invasion attempt did not materialize, the defensive strength of the Martello tower system was never tested, and the tower design was soon rendered obsolete by new developments in heavy artillery. Many were abandoned and fell into decay or were demolished during the 19th century, although some continued in use into the 20th century as signaling or coastguard stations and a few saw use as look out points or gun emplacements during the two World Wars. Of the original 74 towers on the south coast, 26 now survive, and of the 29 on the east coast, 17 now survive. Those which survive well and display a diversity of original components are considered to merit protection.
The area now part of the harbour was once known as the Crumbles. Books include:
There are several to cross over by foot or bike or mobility scooter only, no cars allowed. In the photo below, the main moving bridge is shown.
When in the raised position as in the photo, only vessels can pass underneath, to get to or from Sovereign Harbour North. All pedestrians, cyclists and mobility scooters must wait before they can get to or from The Waterfront with its nice restaurants and shops and, a short distance away, The busy Crumbles retail shopping centre. The bridge opens frequently daily, by pre-arranged signal from Sovereign Harbour berth holders or visitors or the harbours' tour boat.
From Sovereign Harbour North, Pacific Drive. Routes 5 (Monday to Saturday) and 5a (Sundays and Bank Holidays), to/from Eastbourne. Terminus Road, normally 24 minutes. See https://bustimes.org/services/5a-sovereign-harbour-eastbourne.
None in Sovereign Harbour itself but several are close by.
2020 cost per neighboring residential unit is over £315 per year.
Sovereign Harbour South. See waterfeature.eu/. This anchor-shaped water feature, comprising canals, cascades and fountains, is one of the largest of its type in Europe and runs much of the private residential area of Columbus Point in Sovereign Harbour South. Owners of 369 residential properties in the area are covenanted in their deeds to pay for the management, running and maintenance of the water feature. Water in the feature is dosed with chemicals to restrict algae growth, this entering the water is prohibited, should not be paddled or stepped or swum in. The annual cost to neighboring residents is not noted in any estate agent marketing. (There is an additional covenant, the Annual Estate Rental Charge, wrongly referred to as merely a Harbour Charge, £263.55 in 2020, also not noted on most estate agents property listings).
part of Columbus Point Water Feature
Finally opened in November 2019. Site 6, Easter Island Place instead of Site 5 as approved/decided in 2012, of modular construction. Phone 01323 509859 to make bookings.
Has a schedule of charges for entities to hold meetings.
Firmly promised by local councillors in April 2018. Should have been built in 2005. Eastbourne Borough and East Sussex County Council both stated it would be completed before councils allowed any construction of new residential buildings but buildings came first by over 15 years.
Changes galore resulted in the final plan being about 25% reduced in size compared to the original. The project cost over £1.6 million, with £800,000 pledged from Carillion/SHL (since liquidated in January 2018) but paid up, £400,000 from Eastbourne Borough Council (EBC) and £400,000 from the East Sussex County Council.
Ownership of the facility is vested in the Eastbourne Borough Council (EBC). The EBC appointed Sea Change Sussex, a not-for-profit economic development company, to oversee delivery of the project after the former Sovereign Harbour Community Association, once envisaged to manage the complex and the Sovereign Harbour Residents Association both declined to get involved.
Managed by Wave Leisure Trust, a charitable not-for-profit trust. The facility has a kitchen but when completed and opened contained no kitchen equipment such as a sink, stove, etc - unlike all other community centres in all four devolved countries of the UK.
Artist's impressions of planned new Sovereign Harbour Community Centre
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Sovereign Harbour North, another part of marina. Photo cc Keith and Lois Forbes
See https://www.police.uk/sussex/EE3NH21/crime/stats/. From Sussex Police.
Only the marked cycle way pavements along Atlantic and Pacific Drives in South and North Harbours respectively, should be used by cyclists. They are shared with pedestrians and are marked as shown below.
All pathways, footways, walkways of inner and outer Sovereign Harbour without the cycle route sign shown are not cycle routes. Eastbourne Borough Council, in which Sovereign Ward councillors are a part, have made it a point to BAN cyclists along much of Eastbourne's much wider beachfront and seafront promenade. But they ALLOW cyclists to ride along the much narrower pathways and footways of beachfront and seafront Sovereign Harbour.
On the Eastbourne Promenade, 6 metres wide, signs state NO Cycling, an Eastbourne Borough Council (EBC) byelaw.
But on the Sovereign Harbour North Beach walkway, 2 metres wide - a third of the width of the Eastbourne Promenade - the EBC allows cyclists.
concern to residents is the daily
misuse by cyclists of Sovereign Harbour walkways and pathways. Every day,
individual cyclists or couples on cycles and often their children on bikes go
alongside each other, regularly. Single and groups of cyclists mis-use the
Sovereign Harbour North beachfront narrow footpath, going very fast or ringing
their bells or shouting at walkers to get out their way, or weaving in between
walkers and frightening them. When residents walking carefully and slowly have
attempted to speak to and reason with them, they are often abused by cyclists,
told to shut up or are sworn at. One Sovereign Harbour North Beach walkway, only
nine feet wide, was built for walkers, not cyclists who often outnumber the
walkers. Cyclists deliberately ignore the established and clearly cycle-marked
pavements of Atlantic Drive and Pacific Drive with their wide purpose-built
pavement built as a shared way for both pedestrians and cyclists. They unfairly
demand and mis-use the scenic pedestrian or walking pathways and almost totally
ignore the established cycle routes.
Residents really suffer from the attitudes of many cyclists, particularly including those who are not resident but are holiday lodging at the three nearby caravan parks less than a mile away to the east. They treat this private pathway and other harbour areas not as private pathways but as public cycle routes.
They do not
pay any cycle taxes, have caused thousands of accidents with walkers,
surely, in this day and age, if they want more rights, should be taxed for the
roads they use and fined for the non-cycle paths they deliberately and often
contemptuously misuse They want to be able to ride cost free from Eastbourne to Bexhill on Sea,
right through Sovereign Harbour.
The menace of Bespoke. The cycling organization Bespoke has campaigned for over 10 years to allow unrestricted cycling on Eastbourne's promenade despite an EBC bye-law that has prohibited this for good reasons, one of them being that Eastbourne has the highest concentration of elderly, vulnerable and mobility-impaired people in the entire UK and the EBC as well as police have a statutory public authority duty under the UK's Equality Act to give particular care and attention to the disabled and vulnerable, many of whom, on the flat and wide paved promenade pathway, have the space to walk accompanied by carers at their side. Bespoke has also indicated it demands similar access to Sovereign Harbour. Bespoke refuses to condemn shared areas. Nor has Bespoke ever conceded that cycling amongst pedestrians even on fast moving electric bikes is potentially unsafe, or expressed any concerns that it is dangerous to older and disabled residents.
we hope will be of particular relevance is
something not mentioned at all elsewhere to the best of our knowledge and
belief. It may perhaps be deliberately omitted. It is a particularly
significant and hopefully overriding fact. It is that all Sovereign Harbour
walkways and pathways are on private, not public, land. So how can they possibly
be considered by any Member of Parliament or parliamentary committee or
Eastbourne Borough Council or East Sussex Borough Council for any public cyclist
usage? Because of this they should not be compared - yet have been - to any
other public areas or roads or pathways in the UK or Europe or world where
cycling is permitted and encouraged by local, regional and national authorities
as an active exercise.
Sovereign Harbour Councillors from the Eastbourne Borough Council illegally - in clear defiance of the Equality Act and its provisions - allow instead of prohibiting cyclists to ride on privately owned Sovereign Harbour walkways, pathways and footpaths, often dangerously in defiance of walkers, pedestrians, runners, the elderly, vulnerable, disabled and children. Councillors should be protecting and supporting their constituents by (a) realizing that under the Equality Act cyclists should walk not ride their cycles so as not to have a speed advantage over pedestrians and the vulnerable and (b) requiring cyclists to keep to the registered cycle track shared areas of council-adopted Atlantic and Pacific Avenues.
Cyclists, councillors and more need to know that recently from a Guardian newspaper report - see https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/feb/24/cyclist-settles-for-30000-pounds-after-hitting-pedestrian-who-was-looking-at-phone - that a cyclist who knocked over a woman who was looking at her mobile phone while crossing a road was then was successfully sued by the woman concerned. Both the cyclist, Robert Hazeldean, a garden designer, and the pedestrian, Gemma Brushett, who works in finance and also ran yoga retreats, were left unconscious after the rush-hour collision in July 2015. The case exposed how vulnerable uninsured cyclists are to expensive civil claims if they are involved in accidents. Brushett’s lawyers had claimed costs of £112,000 – a sum that would have left Hazeldean facing bankruptcy since he was uninsured. Hazeldean later agreed to settle the case for £30,000 on top of damages of £4,300 and his own costs of more than £25,000. This case will be worrying for uninsured cyclists in Sovereign Harbour and the councils concerned who do not object to cyclists using and misusing the harbour's walkways and pathways.
Councillors allow instead of prohibit cyclists to ride on Sovereign Harbour walkways, pathways and footpaths, often dangerously in defiance of walkers, pedestrians, runners, the elderly, vulnerable, disabled and children, despite Covid 19 social distancing orders from central government.
Councillors should be protecting and supporting their constituents by (a) realizing that under the Equality Act cyclists should walk not ride their cycles so as not to have a speed advantage over pedestrians and the vulnerable and (b) requiring cyclists to keep to the registered cycle track shared areas of council-adopted Atlantic and Pacific Avenues.
With Covid 19 so prevalent in the UK since March 2020, EBC councillors are not insisting as they should and as central government requires all including councillors to abide by, that social distancing be as mandatory on Sovereign Harbour's walkways and pavements as they are elsewhere. Two cyclists passing in opposite direction need approximately three metres of space to maintain a two metre gap. On a two metre path, such as exists long Sovereign Harbour North's beachfront, social distancing is impossible. Thus such paths need to be closed to cyclists instead of councillors permitting them. It is time County and Borough adhered to government's central advice on what constitutes quality walking and cycling active travel) strategies.
Based in Sovereign Harbour. See eastbournernli.org/.
See under "Buying a Sovereign Harbour Property - guidelines"
Each residential unit is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Also see under Eastbourne Fishermen.
In the marina.
Area to the left of photo below, with brick car parking area underneath. The most central of the harbour areas and with some of the most expensive homes.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Social group for Sovereign Harbour residents. Membership is £15 per annum per person. Newcomers to this area of Eastbourne may find it useful. Meets every Wednesday evening usually from 7:30 pm at the Sovereign Harbour Yacht Club. Many members tend to sit at the same tables.
1 Pacific Avenue, Sovereign Harbour North, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 6DW. See https://www.harbourmedicalpractice.co.uk. One of the largest medical practice's in the country, with about 7,500 NHS patients in and beyond Sovereign Harbour North and South. A good practice, a first-class facility, with doctors, nurses and support staff, in a modern building with its own spacious car park and 2 disabled access bays immediately in front of the building. Patients requiring hospitalization are sent to Eastbourne General Hospital or Conquest Hospital in St. Leonard's in Hastings, or, when needed, Royal Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead and Guys Hospital in London. The practice has a Patient Participation Group (PPG)
Patrol occasionally but are rarely seen. When in attendance they operate from the town of Eastbourne, not from a local station.
Not available in all areas of the harbour for casual passers-by or those who are disabled or mobility impaired, cannot walk far and need a bench to stop. The problem is that the Eastbourne Borough Council is apparently required to consult residents within 50 metres of the proposed seats. In the past, residents who were consulted objected on the grounds that seating would cause rowdy behaviour and so the council did not feel able to support the installation of such seating. However, experience with existing seating, such as that near Midway Quay, suggests that this is not the case. Local officials have proposed extra seating benches in the inner harbour and outer harbour. It is hoped they will be sited as far as possible from local flats and houses in the hope that no significant objections will be raised. However, social distancing requirements mean that it is difficult to make progress with these plans.
BN23 5QG - one of the many area residential postcodes. The most common council tax band is E. Estimated residential property values, based on historical transactions and adjusted for inflation, range from £311,346 to £1,078,437 with an average of £454,758. Housing types are typically flats/apartments. 78% of house sales since 1995 have been new builds.
Part of Sovereign Harbour at dusk. Photo cc these authors, Keith and Lois Forbes
Most medium-speed services are available but not high-speed. Services like Virgin Media Ultrafast Fibre - the fastest available in most other areas - are unfortunately not available in Sovereign Harbour, even after four years of some Sovereign Harbour residents having expressed specific interest.
With no Sovereign Harbour residents leasehold and freehold having exclusive use of the communal areas of the private lands on where they live, owned by the developers of their properties, beachside and harbour-side residents should note that casual passers-by including people who do not live in Sovereign Harbour, who walk or cycle along Sovereign Harbour walkways and pathways near their homes, will poach their WIFI signals if they are not appropriately protected. Campers from nearby campsites in Pevensey Bay are often seen with their mobile phones or tablets walking and mobile-phone talking along Sovereign Harbour and beaches pathways and walkways. Many properties along them have WIFI signals which can be captured 50-100 feet away on those pathways and walkways. In other areas beyond Sovereign Harbour, private lands give their private residents exclusive access to their lands, not public use, and their WIFI cannot be reached by the non-resident public.
Open 24 hours a day at specific or pre-ordered times, with a signal showing green or red. All vessels need to pass through a lock to get to or from the sea. At the lock entrance, when closed to marine traffic a narrow iron pedestrian bridge allows pedestrians to walk from North to South Harbours and beyond. When open to marine traffic the bridge is closed to pedestrians.
In the photo, the lock is empty but in spring, summer and autumn it is often full of yachts and motor boats, with curious onlookers on either side.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Pacific Drive, Sovereign Harbour North. The northernmost part of Sovereign Harbour. A large development by J W. Stratton begun in 2017 of 70 homes including a range of house types of 3-4 bedroom detached and semi-detached homes (claimed to be freehold with car port advertised in 2020 from £355,000 freehold). But freehold is restricted, not in fee simple. And 2-bedroom apartments or flats (leasehold). All are subject to an management fee and like the rest of Sovereign Harbour, to the latter's unique-in-the-world Annual Estate Rentcharge, a fact not stated in the marketing brochures. The builder/developer paid a premium to the local authorities to ensure there no social/affordable housing included in this development. The contemporary style of the architectural design is reflected in the specification and finish. Adjacent to the development will be a fully landscaped open space with planting, footpaths etc. This was a condition of the planning assent for the development and one of the stipulations was that it needed to be completed prior to occupation of 40% of the units on site. The present committee has had discussions with the developer and improvements to the plans have been agreed. These include planting trees and additional seating. Eastbourne Borough Council was required to liaise with the developer to align the plant species closer with the councils’ pollinator policy and will look at wildflower planting in some areas. Occupants, all owners or leaseholders in Sovereign Harbour and paying annual estate rentcharge fees, have access to all Sovereign Harbour facilities. The Eastbourne Borough Council is required to install a pedestrian crossing on Pacific Drive and East Sussex County Council a bus shelter on Pevensey Bay Road.
Site 9. North Harbour Beach opposite Caroline Way. The Martello Tower is a Grade II Listed Building and a Scheduled Monument. It is owned by Sovereign Harbour Ltd. who have retained access to the building from Caroline Way. The building is currently in a poor state of repair and is on the buildings at risk register. The Tower could in principle be converted into an alternative use, and because it is important to secure the long term repair and maintenance of the Tower, conversion could be supported subject to discussion with English Heritage. However, given its remote and exposed location, and due to its poor state of repair and the associated costs of refurbishment, conversion is considered unlikely.
In 2020 she was appointed as Parliamentary Private Secretary (PPS) to Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary George Eustice.The unpaid promotion means she becomes the ‘eyes and ears’ of the minister in parliament and liaises with MPs on his behalf. She was given this role at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and believes Eastbourne will benefit as it is a coastal and a rural constituency and the Agriculture, Fisheries and Environment Bills going through parliament in 2020. DEFRA is driving these landmark pieces of legislation to protect the environment, tackle plastic pollution, improve air and water quality and incentivise farmers to enhance soil quality and further raise environmental and animal welfare standards.
She has said: “These are issues at the heart of what many Eastbourne and Willingdon residents care about and they will very much tie in with the town’s ambition to become carbon neutral by 2030.” But nothing has been stated by our MP about at last freeing Eastbourne's Sovereign Harbour at long last from the substantial annual estate rentcharges freeholders andd leaseholders are have to pay that all other parts of Eastbourne do not; the flood defence charges Sovereign Harbour freeholders and leaseholders also have to pay to the Environment Agency that all other homeowners in all other parts of both Eastbourne and the rest of the UK do not.
A PPS is not technically part of the government however, they are expected to support it in votes and must resign if they vote against the government. Which means in effect that Caroline Ansell is presently unwilling or unable to make an individual MP's case about these unique-to-Sovereign Harbour injustices with other Conservative MPs including Huw Merriman whose Bexhill & Battle constituency is next door to Eastbourne and whose 14.400 or so constituent freeholders pay nothing for flood defence over and above their general taxes, unlike the 4,200 or so Sovereign Harbour freeholders and leaseholders who alone in the UK, Europe and the world have to pay £263.55 in addition to their general taxes per home in 2020.
Innovation Park, Sovereign Harbour. A 2,300 metre office block at the entrance to Pacific Drive, North Harbour. Can accommodate up to 70 small to medium business entities, or fewer larger ones. With its own spacious parking area. Of all the available office spaces in Eastbourne and nearby, this is the most expensive by far, as revealed in November 2019.
Careless and inconsiderate parking in some parking areas of various developments limits or prohibits or delays emergency vehicles or prevents them from going as close as possible to and at the side of a building to collect or deliver a patient or attend to any other potentially life-threatening situation.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Cars at 16 San Diego Way, North Harbour, on 30 July 2017 obstructing an ambulance and other emergency vehicles from departingCars are often parked outside both buildings and their garages interfering with or hindering or blocking emergency access, even when there are vacant assigned or visitor parking spaces in that development. Other cars are parked equally dangerously nearby also hindering safe and fast emergency vehicles from accessing or leaving or both. Ambulances and other emergency vehicles need to park parallel with a building, to provide the closest possible access to their back door and the shortest distance to the building to receive or discharge patients. Also, some cars have been seen to partly park on pavements and in the process block lowered-curb roads and denying access for the disabled, or dangerously close to a street junction or sharp turn or in other traffic-disturbing areas. With regional hospitals having announced in May 2017 that stroke patients are now going to have to go to fewer specialist hospitals than before and with it now well-known that stroke patients need to be treated within an hour or they could die, ambulances need totally unimpeded access at all times. When flat-owners and car owners create the problems with their badly parked cars and deaths or life-threatening permanent injuries result, lawsuits could be filed.
Disabled residential Parking. The almost complete lack of disabled parking nearly everywhere is a problem to residents who are disabled. At Golden Gate Way off Pacific Avenue, near and opposite the Pacific Heights North building, there is one Disabled Parking-signed place. That's it. Because it is on private property not a public road, it is not one that will get a penalty for misuse.
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Eastbourne Borough Council and East Sussex County Council do not follow the example of European Union, USA and Canadian jurisdictions in requiring developers of private-area properties to have the same disability parking laws and provisions as in public or town or city areas.
No Disabled Parking Bay at your home. There is an almost-complete lack of any disabled parking spaces at any of the units of flats in the Sovereign Harbour area in their below-building or adjacent parking areas. Some cars are parked so badly that they impede and slow or halt the progress of emergency vehicles. What clearly seems to have happened is that developers have crammed as many parking spaces as they can into their developments, many of which are so small they cannot easily accept longer and wider cars of today, and with none of the undercroft and only one (see photo above, which partially but not wholly meets the standard) having wider and properly disability-marked Disability Parking available. Future residents who are disabled, those not yet committed to any particular development but interested in buying or leasing, should, in their best interests, before they sign any contracts, ask if such disabled-signed parking in or near or under that development is going to be available and if so when. If not answered precisely, it may well discourage them permanently from coming. When The Waterfront complex (see http://www.eastbourneharbour.com) describes Sovereign Harbour in which it is located as "Eastbourne's international experience" and the entire harbour area has street and quay names from prominent places around the world, that "international experience" cachet should be followed by developers in creating parking and disabled parking to international standards in residential areas. Presently, in Sovereign Harbour, none of the many apartment buildings with underground/undercroft parking facilities has any marked disabled parking areas.If your disability means that you need to park close to your home, your local council should be asked to help. If you live in an area where everybody parks on the street, you may be able to arrange, via the council, to have a special disabled parking space created for your car or for a car driven by somebody living at your address who helps you get around. If you have private parking at your home but can't always access it because of how other people park, you can ask the council to mark the street as an access route. If your disability means you can no longer use the parking facilities on your property, or have a disabled-related difficulty in accessing it in winter or due to stone curbs that impede your path and could be dangerous, or some other impediment, you can apply for a reserved on-street parking space. Be aware this may cost the applicant.
Please note that residential disabled car parking spaces provided under the Disabled Car Parking Space scheme are advisory only, and have no legal standing (unlike in the USA, Europe, etc). Although able-bodied drivers are encouraged not to park within a disabled parking space, anyone can use them. Their use relies on the good will of people in the community.
Be aware that even you are disabled in accordance with the above criteria but live in a flat or terraced house in a private off-street development where there is a common driveway but no garage and have an assigned regular (not disabled) parking space not wide enough for a disabled person to access or exit safely, you may still not qualify for a disabled parking space. You should apply anyway at disabled-bay-application-form-for-email.docx but you may be told the Council cannot help because where you live is outwith the remit of the council, and may be referred instead to the managing agent or owner of the building. In which case you will find that some managing agents are more helpful than others. One might say that to allow additional door-width for a disabled person to enter or exit a car an extra parking space can be provided. That has happened at one location. But at the same location (16 San Diego Way, Sovereign Harbour, Eastbourne) another disabled applicant with similarly-qualifying credentials may be told merely simply and unhelpfully that all car park spaces are assigned. The Council cannot intervene in the matter because here in the UK, unlike in the EU or Canada or USA, etc. there are no national or local authority residential or planning regulations requiring private properties to provide genuinely-disabled persons with disabled parking. Only in public areas or on public streets is this required.
Retail areas. There is plenty of limited time ( three hours, enough for most) free parking at The Crumbles retail centre and the Waterfront car parks.. At The Crumbles most of these spaces are close to shops and ASDA has to be complemented for having the largest number seen to date at any supermarket shopping centre in the UK. At the Waterfront complex,
Disabled Parking Spaces. 60 are available at ASDA and 20 at the Waterfront complex. At the latter, all 20 Disabled Parking spaces, despite being on the western end, closest to restaurants, shops and services are at least 150 yards away from them.
See pevensey-bay.co.uk/sovereign-harbour.html. Includes all of Sovereign Harbour. Pevensey Bay residents get their coastal defence at no cost to them. Only Sovereign Harbour residents have to pay it, massively unfairly.
Pevensey Park Homes
A caravan park adjacent to Sovereign Harbour. Caravan dwellers cause a constant nuisance to Sovereign Harbour dwellers of North Harbour private beachfront properties. They cycle on a non-public narrow non-cycle walkway and/or walk along the seafront to go shopping. They use/misuse local residents WIFI. They walk their dogs and don't clean up messes. They leave trash on the beach. They occupy beach space that should be reserved for Sovereign Harbour residents only. They cause more harm than good and make North Harbour beachside properties less appealing to prospective future buyers for these reasons.
0.3 hectares owned by Sovereign Harbour Ltd. A narrow strip of land at the far end of the North Harbour bordering Pacific Drive. Consent was given for this land to be used as a berth-holder car park, and purchasers of adjacent properties were given assurances that there would be no residential development on this plot. However, the Eastbourne Borough Council allowed this to be reneged. The car park was never constructed and Sovereign Harbour Ltd acted aggressively to persuade the Borough Council that it should be used for high-density, high-rise residential development. The Sovereign Harbour Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) had identified this site as ideal for a marina-side public open space. It was agreed between the EBC and Sovereign Harbour Ltd that this would be funded by the construction of eight high quality homes, for which planning consent was granted under the name Port Moresby Place The plan required 50% of the site, the land closest to the marina, to be paved and landscaped for public use. A condition of the consent was that the public open space was to be completed before two thirds of the homes are sold. This conditions was not met and in July 2018 EBC enforced the condition resulting in the sale of the final property being put on hold for four months. With the open space almost complete the sale was eventually allowed to go through in December 2018. The open space was not fully completed until late 2019.
Port Moresby Place, Sovereign Harbour North, Eastbourne BN23 5BL Units 1-8
Each residential unit is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Port Moresby Place. Original artists impression. So unlike the homes elsewhere in the area Those rocks are not there, instead there is a landscaped area with with part of it reserved for residents of the four buildings, each with two units, and below it a public walkway where passersby can stroll.
On harbour-side are several areas where boats can be docked, but none so far have used them. What really annoys other Sovereign Harbour Residents who live further down from this site is how and why cars and vans are constantly parked outside on the main Pacific Drive road, partially blocking it, yet there is plenty of both assigned and unassigned parking within the development.
Port Moresby Management Ltd, see https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09315065/officers.
An Australian family who visited Eastbourne recently and viewed this development commented it is likely named after Port Moresby in Papua, New Guinea, in the same way many other Sovereign Harbour areas are named after well-known islands or countries or areas. They also said they have seen very similar-looking buildings in Australia but they are not private homes, instead a prison farm headquarters buildings. Anyway, the name has stuck and when some local residents pass by this development with its buildings so unlike those of other properties, they refer to them not as Port Moresby Place but because they look more squat and white and not ordinarily residential, as Prison Farm HQ buildings.
Possibly as the result of being cheated by tenants on the other side of the road out of their earlier-promised unrestricted view by the Eastbourne Town Council and Sovereign Harbour Ltd.
A newly constructed semi-detached harbour front house forming part of an exclusive development of just eight houses with panoramic sea views over the inner harbour and the downs beyond. Considerable thought has been given to the design of the house with sliding fully-glazed doors from the principal rooms leading to a terrace, with two upper balconies that fully exploit the glorious views. The house provides all of the benefits associated with modern living with many state-of-the-art design features, including gas under-floor heating, bespoke kitchen units with Corian work surfaces and a comprehensive range of integrated NEFF appliances. Sanitary ware is supplied by Villeroy and Boch. Other benefits include a utility room, double garage and additional visitor parking. The Waterfront, where there are a range of cafes, bars and restaurants is within level walking distance.
Front door. Entrance hall. Kitchen - 22'0" (6.71m) x 22'0" (6.71m).
Terrace - 22'6" (6.86m) x 17'6" (5.33m). Cloakroom. Bedroom 2 - 14'6" (4.42m) x 10'0" (3.05m).
Ensuite shower room.
First floor. Living room - 22'6" (6.86m) x 23'0" (7.01m). Balcony. Bedroom 3 3 - 15'6" (4.72m) x 8'9" (2.67m). Jack & Jill en suite. Bedroom 4/Study - 10'9" (3.28m) x 8'3" (2.51m).
Second floor. Master bedroom- 17'0" (5.18m) x 11'0" (3.35m). Terrace. Dressing room - 11'0" (3.35m) x 7'6" (2.29m). Bathroom.
Lower ground floor. Utility Room. Double Garage. Visitors Parking. Leasehold, 999 year lease. Ground Rent, Peppercorn. Council Tax: H
Sales Record for each unit
Sovereign Harbour residents qualify for this Eastbourne Borough Council discount parking concession at certain local facilities beyond the harbour.
Located five miles offshore directly opposite easternmost Sovereign Harbour. Scheduled for demolition later in 2020. Trinity House began preparation work to decommission Royal Sovereign Lighthouse. With a farewell blast from the lighthouse's fog signal, THV Winston Churchill towed away the last of the series of light vessels which had marked the Royal Sovereign station since 1875. It is intended that the now-deteriorating lighthouse will be completely removed clear to the seabed. The Royal Sovereign Lighthouse was built in 1971 with a design life of 50 years. It was brought into operation at noon on 6 September 1971. Having monitored the fabric of the lighthouse over the last decade and observing the expected signs of deterioration, Trinity House concluded that the ongoing safety of the mariner requires that the structure be fully decommissioned.
The Royal Sovereign Lighthouse has provided nearly 50 years of reliable service as an aid to navigation, one of over 600 that Trinity House operates for the benefit and safety of the mariner. In anticipation of its intention to remove Royal Sovereign Lighthouse, Trinity House has upgraded Beachy Head Lighthouse; it will also increase the capability of the offshore CS2 buoy and will retain the nearby Royal Sovereign buoy. The upgrade to Beachy Head Lighthouse has increased the number of solar panels around the base of its lantern gallery and included installation of a longer-range LED lantern, with the CS2 lighted buoy will also benefitting from an increase in range. Once Trinity House decommissions the Royal Sovereign Lighthouse as proposed, Beachy Head Lighthouse’s future is secured as the principal aid to navigation in the area.
Trinity House’s Deputy Master Captain Ian McNaught said: it is never an easy decision to discontinue and even remove such a prominent aid to navigation, but the first priority will always be the safety of the mariner. Now that Royal Sovereign Lighthouse has reached the end of its serviceable life, it is time for us to take steps to ensure that the lighthouse itself does not become a hazard. There will be a lot of work involved for our engineers and our various other teams and we will be working extensively in collaboration with a number of organisations to ensure the success of this project."
Each residential unit shown is subject to Annual Estate Rentcharges
Sovereign Outer Harbour at dusk 2. Photo cc these authors, Keith and Lois Forbes
For boat owners, residents and visitors, whose vessels are moored in one or more of the harbours 5 marinas.
Sovereign Harbour boat tours
More will be posted shortly:
Established in 2000 to give Harbour residents a strengthened and co-ordinated voice in all discussions on the management and development of Sovereign Harbour. It states in its manifesto that it represents the interests of all, not just some harbour residents whether renting, leasing or owning. Membership, via presentation of the membership card, brings discounts from certain local businesses. The work of the SHRA is funded by a one-off, life membership subscription, presently £10, from members including everyone in their households, supplemented by commercial sponsorship of the SHRA web site and newsletter, "Waterlines. " There is no SHRA committee involvement in other controversial aspect of Sovereign Harbour life such as the Sovereign Harbour beaches and cycling misuse; dog mess nuisance, lack of trees, parking problems, harbour charge; only in Planning issues. The only real benefit of membership in return for the £10 is the 10% discount offered at some Sovereign Harbour or nearby establishments when a membership card is produced. Does not allow members to have online access to monthly meetings, only to Annual General Meetings; declines to agree to link to some websites - even those of some members.
Also known as The Crumbles. Shops and Services. Owned by M&G Real Estate.
An 8 screen Cineworld cinema was here until July 2016. Premises are currently vacant. Residents were deprived of the cinema when it moved to Eastbourne at the insistence of the Eastbourne Borough Council's (EBC) and East Sussex County Council, when they invested hugely in the redevelopment of the retail mall in downtown Eastbourne that has become since March 2020 and the Covid 19.pandemic, to be a major financial disaster to the councils because all retail units and the new Cineworld cinema installed in it after July 2016 have been shut until late June 2020. Residents want another cinema or entertainment facility on the old cinema site, but the EBC and ESCC do not want competition for the relocated town cinema. When M&G, the retail park owners, applied to change the use of the cinema building to retail use, the EBC imposed onerous planning restrictions, of the type neither EBC nor ESCC require elsewhere, on this retail centre. The conditions include the prohibition of selling fashion, footwear, sportswear, toys and food in order to protect the vitality and viability of the town centre ffrom significant harm. Until these restrictions are lifted, it will be difficult to find any tenant. M&G have obtained planning permission for a refurbishment of the retail park, but this has been delayed because of COVID 19.
It has to be asked if M&G, owners of the Sovereign Village/Crumbles Retail area, has thought of contacting or already contacted any/all the independent cinema companies referred to in https://www.screendaily.com/features/why-independent-cinemas-are-booming-in-the-uk/5130085.article. It seems several have been looking for new locations. Or has M&G tried to contact them but wants too much rent and/or possibly been told the EBC and or ESCC, which collectively acted or persuaded Cineworld to move from Sovereign Harbour to town, would object to having another cinema where Cineworld was. Some Sovereign Harbour residents have apparently suggested the cinema be torn down and replaced by an open air facility for use by adults and children. But many other residents, in both Sovereign Harbour and beyond, are horrified. They hate the thought of that locale being demolished.. They hope for another cinema.
One thing is for sure. EBC were wrong to think that people from the wide area of Sovereign Harbour and Pevensey, Bexhill, etc will be prepared, after the cinema that was here and free parking was right outside, was pressured to leave for the Eastbourne town centre and no free parking will go there instead, with the annoying traffic problems getting there and back as well. They will not, they will stay at home and watch films on TV.
But if another cinema has been thoroughly explored and is not possible might a better alternative be to ask if any talented or artistic or community minded Sovereign Harbour folks - and other residents from a wider geographic area, say from Bexhill or Pevensey and beyond, who already go to ASDA, Boots, Next, Wilco, etc - are interested, at least in principle, in using the building to set up a collective of small shops, for woodworking, jewels, arts, crafts, etc. Indoor, for year round use, not outdoor for only good weather use, should surely be more desired for that building.
Frankie & Benny's were here until March 2020. Premises are currently vacant. Local residents really liked it but an EBC councillor said, wrongly, she was glad it went as it had not changed its menu. It had.
The Deed and Grant of Covenant. This is not mentioned upfront by the Eastbourne Borough Council or East Sussex County Council or estate agents. None of the latter have ever been required by these local authorities or central government to make a full disclosure of exactly what the Annual Estate Rentcharge is, what it comprises and who has to pay it, for the benefit of consumers and would-be purchasers of Sovereign Harbour property. Specimen copies of the deed with the relevant obligations are not made available in advance to potential buyers. All that is said by same estate agents, very misleadingly, is that there is a "harbour charge". All harbours have a harbour charge but it is levied on marine craft. In the absence of information to the contrary it was assumed by many new owners that this is a normal harbour charge for all harbours in the UK, Europe and world. They were and are duped. No precise information is given in advance to let them know that there is no standard "harbour charge" as such. Instead, all purchasers of a Sovereign Harbour residential unit (property), as conditions of the sales contract, are required to sign a Deed of Grant and Covenant which obliges the purchaser to pay the Estate Rentcharge to the harbor's owners, the privately-held Wellcome Trust and its subsidiary (since May 2015) Premier Marinas. The charge is levied by the owners' private Sovereign Harbour Trust via its privately-held subsidiary Sovereign Harbour (Sea Defences) Community Interest Company. This requirement is attached to the property deeds, so the obligation passes to all subsequent owners of the property. The basis for the charge is an agreement between Southern Water and Tarmac Construction in 1988. At that time, Southern Water was responsible for coastal defences and Tarmac Construction. later Carillion, was the owner of the development land at Sovereign Harbour.
Two main parts
The Sovereign Harbour Trust (SHT) is a company limited by guarantee, set up to preserve and protect the environment along the beach frontage in front of Sovereign Harbour. The registered office and correspondence address and those of its Sovereign Harbour (Sea Defences) CIC is Number 22, Mount Ephraim, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN4 8AS. The SHT was originally registered as a charity but, in 2010, the Trust’s charitable status was withdrawn as ‘it had never demonstrated any charitable activities’. The Trust was removed from the Charity Commission register and is now dormant. However, on its website it still shows its hold on and interest in the rentcharge. On its website the Trust publishes A Guide to the Estate Rentcharge. Following the loss of charitable status (but on the front of the website it still shows itself as a charity( in order to maintain the right to collect the rentcharge, the Trust incorporated - without any pre-warning to Sovereign Harbour residents - a wholly owned Community Interest Company (CIC) Sovereign Harbour (Sea Defences), to demand and collect and manage the administration of the income. It may be a Community Interest company as far as people who do not live in Sovereign Harbour, possibly up to 17,000 properties between Sovereign Harbour and Bexhill-on-Sea are concerned because while they live in the same flood zone they do not pay a penny for the environmental protection they get from the Environment Agency and Pevensey Coastal Defence Ltd. But there is no Community Interest benefit whatsoever for the 3,119 owners of Sovereign Harbour property who alone pay the Rentcharge (but this is omitted from any mention on the websites of the SHT, its CIC and Pevensey Coastal Defence Ltd.). The Trust uses the CIC to collect the Estate Rentcharge and distributes the monies collected to the Environment Agency (EA) and to the marina operator, Premier Marinas. The EA entered into a long-term (25 year, expires in 2025) Public Private Partnership (PPP/PFI) agreement with Pevensey Coastal Defence Ltd. for the flood defence work. The latter contracts with a number of commercial companies to do its work. Interestingly, although it was lauded in 2001as a unique PPP/PFI, the first of its type, it has remained, not surprisingly given its cost, so unfairly, to only 3,119 owners of Sovereign Harbour residential property, no one else, the only one of its type.
In early 2020 it was revealed to these authors by Eastbourne tourism officials that The Wellcome Trust's and Premier Marinas-owned Sovereign Harbour had about 3.4 million visitors out of the 5.2 experienced by the town. Instead of charging those 3.4 million visitors a moderate admissions fee as many other Eastbourne attractions charge, visitors are given free access at all times by The Wellcome Trust and Premier Marinas. Where they recoup their costs and make money besides in in charging not those 3.4 million visitors but merely the 3,119 freehold and leasehold residents of Sovereign Harbour, as a unique 2020 Annual Estate Rentcharge of £263.55 per freehold home or leased apartment, highest in the world, irrespective of whether the property is worth £180,000 or £1.25 million. They could earn so much more money for the harbour's upkeep and to pay Sovereign Harbour's unique Environment Agency cost, only one anywhere in the world, a so-called public sector/private sector partnership once deemed a pioneer of its type - but not copied by any other UK or European or world environmental agency because it is so unfair to a single small liable group of residents only while others get it for free - by charging those 3.4 million visitors £1.00 a head instead of those 3,119 Sovereign Harbour residents alone at £263.55 per household unit. Premier Marinas owns many other harbours and marinas in the UK including in Brighton, but Sovereign Harbour is the only one, in the UK and world, with an Annual Estate Rentcharge.
It must be emphasised that the Government's Community Interest Company (CIC) regulations require a CIC to consult its stakeholders (i.e. the residents) about its activities, and to provide high quality information rather than just the required minimum.
Southern Railway. Stations are Eastbourne; Hampden Park (about. 3 miles away); Polegate (Approx. 5 miles away); Pevensey & Westham (approx. 3 miles away; and) Pevensey Bay (approx. 3 miles away). Beyond Pevensey Bay are more stations going east to Bexhill and Hastings.
By Age Concern.
Written, administered and web-mastered by
Keith A. Forbes at
© 2020. Revised: July 9, 2020